[quotePost id=119892]I think the Control Assigns only start to make sense after you have run through the process a few times. That said, I did find it hard to picture at first.

I have said before I would have liked to see Parameter Values changing in the EDIT Screens.... may be a White "Programmed" value, underset with a Red "Active" value (= Programmed Value +/- Offset Value). This way you could at least see if your Scaling was good, or adjust it if was causing the value to Pin.

I think if the Parameter Box changed colour.... say to Orange... if it was under a Control Assign would also help debug, when weird stuff starts happening (cannot turn reverb off, cannot use Sliders for Volume etc).

BTW.... has Bill left? I've not seen any posts lately, but it also looks like everything he ever wrote has been deleted.

BTW2... The Filters are fine... dig into the tutorials I wrote. [/quotePost]

I've read your filter write-ups...

... which don't change the nature and performance of these filters which, like the reverbs, aren't good for the modern era. They're fine... is mostly true, but not good, and definitely not great, nor charismatic. And a lot of the ways resonance behaves is not even fine... just yuk, in a lot of cases, especially when wanting to make rapid movements of the filter's properties as per many types of modern musical sounds... and sound effects.

I agree, any kind of visualisation of values propagated and being modified would be a huge boon... but I'm not so much talking about the discovery and ascertaining of what's going on, but the fine tuning of creative endeavours being much faster and funner and easier if we had visual feedback and presentations of relationships we could monitor and then build upon in subsequent Parts.

Making a big combination of sounds is tedious, subsequently modelling it and reshaping it is an exercise in infuriation because you're going to need a pen and paper and a pinup board, which simply shouldn't be the case when there's a touchscreen front and centre.

Bill has changed his account to the name of "Andrew" and, yes, deleted all his prior posts.

When I first noticed that he was sometimes deleting posts, and therefore all answers attached to them, I made a post, somewhat tongue in cheek, for folks to paste his best contributions before/if he deleted them. Then he went and deleted all of them.

This is a stackoverflow type behaviour, common to agitator and badgerer types that enjoy dissonance making under the supposed pretext of being benevolent assistance providers. They then delete the original instigating evidences of their activities in the comments. Some of the most famous writers about programming languages do this on that site. It's an absolute hellhole of bad faith, selfishness and socialised digi-fascistic nonsensical hierarchical nerd dick measuring. and it's largely shaped, reinforced and accentuated the worst tendencies of the programming community's discourse and manner for over a decade.